The wrestling world is abuzz with a shocking revelation: Andrade, a prominent wrestler, might be barred from competing in AEW for an entire year due to WWE's new non-compete clauses! But here's where it gets controversial... WWE might be attempting to enforce a non-compete period without paying Andrade, which could be a strategic move to keep him off the competition's roster.
According to Wrestling Observer Radio, WWE sent a letter to AEW stating that they cannot use Andrade on their TV shows due to a non-compete clause in his WWE contract. This is surprising, as Andrade was reportedly fired by WWE for violating their Wellness Policy. Usually, a wrestler released from their contract is paid during the non-compete period and can sign with another promotion afterward. However, this scenario is unique because Andrade was allegedly not paid by WWE after his termination and subsequent signing with AEW.
PW Insider revealed that WWE aims to avoid wrestlers intentionally getting fired to join competitors immediately. They are enforcing a non-compete period without pay for Andrade, who, after appearing on AEW Dynamite and wrestling in Mexico, was contacted by WWE to clarify his release terms. This explains his absence from AEW programming.
Furthermore, F4WOnline's Bryan Alvarez claims that the new standard for WWE/TKO contracts includes a one-year non-compete period if a talent is fired for cause or breaches their contract. This clause is what's holding up Andrade's situation. While it may not hold up legally, it's a bold move by WWE.
It's a tricky situation. WWE potentially preventing a wrestler from working elsewhere for a year without pay seems extreme. AEW and Andrade might need to take legal action, but that process can be lengthy and tedious. So, the question remains: Will WWE succeed in keeping Andrade away from AEW for a full year?
What do you think, wrestling fans? Is WWE's strategy fair, or does it cross the line? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
